USDA NIFA · AFRI Foundational (A1642)

Building Trust in Precision Livestock Farming Using Public Engagement

A Michigan State University research project asking an open question: when, and why, does the public accept or reject the data-driven technologies now used to care for dairy cows and pigs? And what would it take for their use to earn lasting public trust?

$585,000USDA NIFA award
2026–20304-year performance period
~3,000public voices surveyed
Dairy & Swinerobotic milkers & sow feeders
About the project

Technology should earn the public's trust, not assume it

U.S. animal agriculture faces rising public concern about animal welfare, environmental impact, and the long-term sustainability of livestock farming. Precision Livestock Farming (PLF), data-driven technology that monitors and manages individual animals, has been proposed as one way forward. But whether it should be adopted depends not only on how well it works, but on whether the public sees it as trustworthy and acceptable: a concept known as a social license to operate.

This project does not assume PLF is good or bad. Instead, it treats public acceptance as an open, empirical question and works directly with members of the public to understand their values and concerns. We focus on two technologies already used on farms: robotic milking systems for dairy cows and electronic sow feeders for pigs.

Because biosecurity rules that protect farm animals, and practical budget limits, mean we cannot bring thousands of people onto a working farm, we begin with a small group of citizens who visit MSU's farms in person. What they learn shapes national surveys that show the wider public real images and videos of the technology, and a closing conference that brings citizens, advocates, and industry together to co-create guidelines for using PLF responsibly.

What we're doing

Five connected objectives

Each phase feeds the next, moving from listening, to measuring, to co-creating guidance.

1

Citizen jury

Bring a diverse group of citizens onto MSU's dairy and swine farms to see PLF firsthand and deliberate on its benefits and risks.

2

National survey

Survey the U.S. public to measure acceptance and rejection of PLF and what drives trust, fairness, and confidence.

3

Technology exposure

Test how seeing different PLF technologies shapes public attitudes across feeling, thinking, and behavior.

4

Change over time

Repeat the survey to track how public attitudes toward PLF shift as people are exposed to the technology.

5

Consensus conference

Convene citizens, advocates, and industry to co-develop ethical guidelines that keep PLF aligned with public values.

Our approach

A four-year journey from the farm to national guidance

Year 12026–27

ListenCitizen jury on MSU farms; design and run the first national survey establishing a baseline of public attitudes.

Year 22027–28

MeasureTechnology-exposure experiment showing the public real videos and photos of robotic milkers and sow feeders.

Year 32028–29

TrackRepeat the exposure survey with a new national sample to measure how attitudes change over time.

Year 42029–30

Co-createConsensus conference translating the findings into shared, ethical guidelines for responsible PLF.
Who we are

An interdisciplinary team

Animal welfare science, economics, philosophy, and psychology, across MSU and Scotland's Rural College.

Portrait of Dr. Babatope Akinyemi

Dr. Babatope Akinyemi

Principal Investigator

Applied & behavioral economist. Leads the project and the national surveys.

Portrait of Dr. Heather Douglas

Dr. Heather Douglas

Co-PI · Philosophy

Expert in public engagement with science. Leads the citizen jury.

Portrait of Dr. Janice Siegford

Dr. Janice Siegford

Co-PI · Animal Behavior & Welfare

15+ years in precision livestock technology. Leads the consensus conference.

Portrait of Dr. Lesley Jessiman

Dr. Lesley Jessiman

Consultant · SRUC (UK)

Psychologist specializing in human behavior change.

Get involved

Your voice can shape the future of farming

We are looking for members of the public to help us understand what matters to people about technology in animal agriculture. No special knowledge is needed. We want a wide range of views, including skeptical ones.

Year 1

Citizen jury

Spend a day at MSU's dairy and swine farms, see the technology firsthand, and share your views. Travel supported and a stipend provided.

Years 1–3

National surveys

Take a short online survey about your views on farm technology. Open to U.S. adults; completed from home.

Year 4

Consensus conference

Join a two-day conversation with citizens, advocates, and industry to help write guidelines for responsible technology use.

This study has been reviewed by the Michigan State University Institutional Review Board (IRB) and determined exempt under federal human-subjects rules (MSU Study ID STUDY202601233, September 15, 2026). Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time. Questions about your rights as a research participant can be directed to the MSU Human Research Protection Program at 517-355-2180 or IRB@msu.edu.

Findings & resources

Project outputs

As the project progresses, we'll share publications, data, and public-facing resources here. Items marked “Coming soon” will be added as they are produced.

Peer-reviewed research

Publications

Open-access articles in animal-science, economics, and social-science journals, deposited to the USDA National Agricultural Library.

Coming soon
Open data

Datasets

De-identified survey and workshop data shared through the NAL Ag Data Commons for transparency and reuse.

Coming soon
Capstone

PLF ethics guidelines

Public-informed guiding principles for the responsible, welfare-enhancing use of precision livestock farming.

Expected 2030
Public engagement

Videos & explainers

Short farm videos and plain-language explainers co-developed with the citizen jury to show how the technology really works.

Coming soon
Outreach

Extension & media

Articles, podcasts, and briefings for producers, industry, and the public via MSU Extension.

Coming soon
Presentations

Conferences

Findings shared at ASAS, AAEA, and AAAS meetings and with industry organizations.

Coming soon
Partners & funding

Supported by

↑